Kindle Ebook Sphere Author Michael Crichton – xermadeenfotos.org
Kindle Ebook Sphere Author Michael Crichton – xermadeenfotos.org
First an overlong apologist s eview of Michael Crichton Then a very short eview of Sphere Life update I am procrastinatingIn my opinion you can only truly ate a Michael Crichton book by a the depth and originality of the concept and b the lucidity of the monologueessay that will always occur usually as a ant from some broken visionary genius or another approx 45 of the way through the book Rating Michael Crichton on his prose either its subtlety or execution is sort of pointless there s no doubt that this man is a shitty prose writer shor Bullet points seem appropriate when it comes to Sphere the 1987 science fiction thriller by Michael Crichton One of the ualities about Crichton s work that I love is the unabashed clarity of his concepts and the dependable navigation of his novels Crichton doesn t seem like he s lost or should stop to ask for directions Other writers those with loftier creative ambitions perhaps tend to circle around ideas like mankind s first contact with extraterrestrials as if they ve never been in this neighborhood before Crichton doesn t take the scenic oute He accelerates directly to FINISH usually provoking uite a literary ush Usually Norman Johnson a 53 year old psychologist is aced across the Pacific Ocean in a Navy helicopter Skipped from Honolulu to Guam to Pago Pago to wherever he is Norman is on the FAA s list of crash site teams and has esponded to three airline disasters in the last decade The Navy has told him that there s been an airplane crash but information en oute has been murky Out of the blue appear than a dozen ships eight Navy destroyers two Remote Vehicle Support ships a Mission Support and Supply ship and a couple of Oceanic Survey and Research Vessels including the John Hawes which Norman is dropped off on Norman is taken to the project commander Captain Harold Barnes Informed that there were no survivors Norman is at a loss as to why he was summoned his specialty being the treatment of psychological trauma suffered by airline crash survivors Barnes notifies Norman that there is no aircraft It s a spacecraft And estimations are that the crash occurred three hundred years ago Norman is here because of a eport the National Security Council paid him to write for the Carter administration ecommending contingency plans in the event of extraterrestrial contact Norman s paper which he considered a joke at the time was titled Recommendations for the Human Contact Team to Interact with Unknown Life Forms ULF Norman is taken to meet his ecommendations Ted Fielding is a 40 year old astrophysicist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pompous but cheerful he s a science communicator who s appeared on television and is a major advocate of SETI the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence He can t wait to get down to the spacecraft which is settled only a thousand feet beneath the surface Ted compensates for his perceived lack of accomplishment in his field by hoping this event will be his legacy Beth Halpern is a 36 year old zoologist biochemist at the University of Chicago She s a serious weightlifter and unner Her ecent work has been studying cephalopods Her thesis is that if not for their three year life span octopi might be the dominant intelligence on earth Beth eveals to Norman that Barnes is ex Navy and as a member of the Defense Science Board advises the Joint Chiefs of Staff on weapons acuisitions Harry Adams is a 30 year old mathematician at Princeton the youngest but most vital member of the team His job is to communicate with the ULF A prodigy in the field of probability he has a chip on his shoulder but is almost always ight He theorizes that the spacecraft is view spoilernot from another planet hide spoiler You look so unhappy ight now That is a uote from my boy. A group of American scientists are ushed to a huge vessel that has been discovered esting on the ocean floor in the middle of the South Pacific What they find defies their imaginations and mocks.
Friend about my face while eading this I fell asleep while eading this In the middle of the day It also took me almost three months to ead Safe to say I did not enjoy it I absolutely loveloved Jurassic Park who doesn t so I was eally excited to dive into my second Michael Crichton book Boy was it a let down I m not going to lie the writing was eally good the science was fun and the characters were likable but boy was the plot L A M E I thought this was going to be some upside down interdimensional travel alien attack story but it was far from it It dragged on forever and when the action finally started it was eally unimpressive REALLY unimpressive I didn t feel the same suspense I got from Jurassic Park but then again it s Jurassic Park so I did like that this book was focused on Psychology and that it explored the shadow self but I thought I was going to be on the edge of my seat Which I was not I was half asleep That being said what I eally love about Michael Crichton s books is that he makes science eally fun and explains it in a way that someone who isn t scientifically inclined AKA me can understand and eally enjoy it I could also laugh at science y jokes like I knew what was going one which made me feel smart and cool So even though this one was a bust I ll still check it his other books Jurassic Park awakened my intrigue for Sci Fy and I m sure he has another spine tingling gem out there Back in 1993 after eading Jurassic Park see eview of that book HERE I was like in Crichton mode actived So my next novel had to be by Michael CrichtonI went to the bookstore and this one was the first book that I checked and after eading the premise I found it promising So I bought it and started to ead itWoWSince the beginning I was in shock amalgamated with happiness since the style and mood of the novel was astonishing good Of course by then I h Sphere Michael CrichtonSphere is a 1987 novel by Michael Crichton It was adapted into the film Sphere in 1998 The story follows Norman Johnson a psychologist engaged by the United States Navy who joins a team of scientists assembled to examine a spacecraft of unknown origin discovered on the bottom of the Pacific Ocean The novel begins as a science fiction story but uickly transforms into a psychological thriller developing into an exploration of the nature of the human imagination 2004 Well that was very strangeThis book is a combination of psychological thriller and science fiction It follows a group of scientists as they investigate what is thought to be an alien vessel that crashed on the ocean floorCrichton s musings have a tendency to be deeply speculative of the human condition but without using language that alienates the audience I can follow his line of thinking easily without getting lost This novel s plot takes a sharp left turn off the path I expected it to take which isn t necessarily a bad thing It just gave me an odd feeling I wasn t sure how to anticipate what was coming Shit got eal weird eal uickThe conclusion of this novel was genuinely shocking There were moments here and there where I felt authentic fear I had the urge to keep looking over my shoulder even though the events taking place in the book didn t elate at all to what I was doing in eal life But something was keeping me from investing in the characters I just couldn t elate to any of them on a personal level and I didn t much care who survived to the end of the book It s a well written piece of sci fi and definitely a novel that fans of the genre can enjoy It doesn t compare to Crichton s Jurassic Park but still a fun ide Very much yada yada humanities vs natural sciences and a wasted plot idea with far too less action and twistsI still emember how boredom and disappointment grew after. Their attempts at logical explanation It is a spaceship of phenomenal dimensions apparently undamaged by its fall from the sky And most startling it appears to be at least three hundred years old.
Michael Crichton ã 2 Summary
The first few chapters showed the setting and some suspense was built up and then it got lengthy and neither the psychological inner character plot nor the other big mystery plot made much fun or sense especially because the logic of motivations and thinking capacities and abilities of the protagonists were averageSome seem to see some kind of deeper philosophical meaning in this one especially towards the end with something one could call a subtle plot twist but to me it was a too constructed not well designed novel It tried to be mindfuing but the ealization was poorPossibly in its time when there were not much of similar techno and science thriller works with Sci Fi elements for a broader audience it could have been seen as not so bad because of a lack of alternatives but especially compared with what t I had some idea what to expect when I picked up the late Michael Crichton s sci fi thriller Sphere because I d seen the movie years ago a movie I love by the way despite a lot of lambasting from the critics and grumbling from the book s fans Sure it isn t perfect with its moments of cheese and flubs nevertheless the exciting chilling core of Crichton s story is evident and for me the film still stands as a great example of escapist cinema that mesmerizing addictive blend of science fiction and horror But I m probably forgiving than most One of my favorite movie genres is space horror There s something about the claustrophobic sueeze of the group in peril scenario as it hurtles through the freezing oxygenless void of space where no one can hear you scream Or the imperiled stranded on an uninhabited hostile planet where the very environment wants to kill you Alien Aliens Moon 2001 A Space Odyssey Event Horizon and Pitch Black just to name a few Sphere is not set in space but it mi 25 stars Was debating whether to give it a 25 or a 3 with the number changing throughout the book Man this was Lukewarm Lackluster Disappointing definitely What I liked Interesting premise that held my attention up until the middle of the book where improbable things start happening and Crichton failed to make them feel eal Slightly dry witty style of writing but again made the dialogue eally unrealisticWhat I didn t like Terribly written characters Crichton eally overdid it on Beth a woman scientist who has inferiority and self esteem issues and talk a lot about how men is constantly being sexist towards her Crichton has managed to make her into a whiny insecure overcompensating person on the issue of her gender Surely a complex personality can be used as a plot pointportrayal of imperfect womanwhatever he was trying to achieve than a caricature of a feminist which obviously is basically the author s negative impression of them Pop psychology The whole Norman trying to analyze his colleagues but failing because his observations are written by someone who plainly didn t have knowledge of the field If there s anything a psychology student hate than the type of psychology you see on Facebook Unrealistic portrayal of emotions situations personalities The premise isn t unforgettable egrettably It s uite underwhelming Read this when I was in high school and was one of the few times I ve been up nearly all night eading saying to myself every hour I need to go to sleep but then couldn t put it down The movie adaptation was atrocious so don t judge this story based on the film I always pictured Ted Knight in the ole of Ted not Liev Schreiber though Mr Schreiber is a talented actor The story has a very tense claustrophobic feel and ightly so as the characters are trapped at the bottom of the oceanOne of my all time favorite uotes about learning vs experience Do you want to understand how to ide a bicycle or do you want to get on and start id. The suspense is ealTHE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEWA page turnerChichton's writing is cinematic with powerful visual images and nonstop action This book should come with hot buttered popcornNEWSWEE.
Odds On 1966 was written under the pseudonym